8.3/ 10

François Rochon

Founder & Portfolio Manager, Giverny Capital

Trusted — Strong track record
Reviewed August 12, 2026Also known as: Francois Rochon, Giverny Capital
Public record: No adverse public records found

The short version

François Rochon founded Giverny Capital in 1993 and has run the Rochon Global Portfolio ever since. Since inception, the portfolio has compounded at roughly 14.7% annualized versus about 9.3–9.9% for its benchmark — five points of alpha a year, sustained through the 2000–02 and 2008 crashes, disclosed every year in unusually candid annual letters that break down every winning and losing position. We rate him 8.3 / 10 — Trusted.

Why the high rating

  • Over 30 years of public, itemized results. Few managers publish annual letters as detailed and as honest about mistakes as Rochon’s — readers can check the reasoning behind individual positions, not just the headline return.
  • A stated, numbers-first checklist, applied consistently: return on equity above roughly 15%, EPS growth above roughly 10%, debt under about 4x profit, a durable market position, and a five-year forward valuation model with a built-in margin of safety.
  • Skin in the game and long holding periods. Rochon favors management teams with meaningful personal ownership, and his own average holding period runs around seven years — a genuine long-term record, not short-term outperformance.

Fair cautions

  • Concentrated portfolio. Giverny typically holds 15–20 stocks, which means higher volatility and real periods of sharp underperformance — notably in 2008 and 2022 — compared with a diversified index fund.
  • Smaller and less independently audited than mega-cap peers. Performance figures come primarily from Rochon’s own letters rather than a third-party fund administrator’s public reporting, though SEC 13F filings corroborate his firm’s holdings.

Bottom line

A three-decade, benchmark-beating record built on a genuinely explainable checklist and unusually candid letters — with the volatility that comes from real concentration, not index-like diversification.

Invest like Rochon: AI prompt

His five-part checklist is stated explicitly and consistently across three decades of letters, which makes it straightforward to turn into an evaluation framework. Paste this into any AI assistant, with a company or ticker in mind:

Act as a disciplined value investor following François Rochon's documented Giverny
Capital framework. I will give you a company. Evaluate it strictly using these
criteria, in order, and tell me where it fails first if it fails:

1. Financial strength screen — is return on equity above roughly 15%, has EPS grown
   at roughly 10%+ annually over a multi-year period, and is debt under roughly 4x
   annual profit? Show the actual numbers.
2. Durable market position — does this business hold a genuine leadership position
   in its niche that competitors would struggle to displace? Name the specific
   source of that position.
3. Management quality and alignment — is management skilled, passionate about the
   business, and meaningfully invested alongside outside shareholders (real insider
   ownership, not token grants)?
4. Five-year intrinsic value estimate — using conservative growth and margin
   assumptions, project the business's value five years out, and compare it to
   roughly double the current price. Is there a real margin of safety at today's
   price against that five-year estimate?
5. Concentration fit — would this be a top-20 conviction holding, or is it a
   marginal, diversification-only position? Rochon's approach only works if you're
   willing to size positions meaningfully.

Give me a verdict: PASS (buy-worthy at the right price), WATCH (good business, wrong
price), or FAIL (skip — name which criterion it fails), and the single biggest risk
to the thesis over a 5-year holding period. Flag this as a research framework, not
financial advice, and do not guarantee any outcome.

Sources

Editorial opinion — verify before you act.This review is independent editorial opinion based on public information and is not financial or legal advice. Ratings can change as new facts emerge. If you are the subject of this review and believe something is inaccurate, see ourcorrections & removals policy.

← Back to all reviews