1/ 10

James Wellesley

Co-operator of Bordeaux Cellars (fine-wine investment scheme)

Avoid — Serious red flags
Reviewed July 1, 2026Also known as: Bordeaux Cellars, Andrew Fuller, Andrew Templar
Public record: Criminal conviction on record

What the public record shows

James Wellesley (who also used the names “Andrew Fuller” and “Andrew Templar”) co-operated Bordeaux Cellars, a fine-wine investment scheme. He pleaded guilty to wire fraud conspiracy and was sentenced to 10 years in prison for a fraud of roughly $99 million. His co-defendant, Stephen Burton, pleaded guilty to wire fraud and money- laundering conspiracy. This is a criminal conviction — not an allegation.

The scheme — “backed by” wine that barely existed

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York:

  • Bordeaux Cellars solicited investors with high-yield loans supposedly secured by rare, collectible wine — the wine was the “collateral” that made the loans feel safe.
  • In reality, the operation never controlled more than 217 bottles, despite claiming to hold about 25,000 bottles from prestigious producers.
  • It was a Ponzi scheme — the “interest” was paid from new investor money, not real wine-backed lending.

Why we rate this 1 / 10 — Avoid

A guilty plea and a 10-year sentence in a classic alternative-asset fraud. Wine, whiskey casks, art, and collectibles are favored fraud vehicles precisely because they’re exotic, illiquid, and hard for an ordinary investor to verify — so the “collateral” can be almost entirely fictional.

Red flags this case teaches

  • “Asset-backed” claims you can’t independently verify. Demand proof the assets exist, in the quantity claimed, held by an independent custodian in your name.
  • Exotic collateral + high fixed yields is a recurring combination in fraud.
  • Alternative assets have no FDIC/SIPC safety net — the diligence burden is entirely yours.

Bottom line

Convicted and sentenced to 10 years. “Secured by rare wine” is only as real as the wine — and here there were 217 bottles behind a $99 million story. Verify the collateral, or pass.

Sources

Editorial opinion — verify before you act.This review is independent editorial opinion based on public information and is not financial or legal advice. Ratings can change as new facts emerge. If you are the subject of this review and believe something is inaccurate, see ourcorrections & removals policy.

← Back to all reviews